The choice of language and its relationship to the impact of hydrological studies. Reply to discussions of "Editorial-Quantifying the impact of hydrological studies"

D. Koutsoyiannis, and Z. W. Kundzewicz, The choice of language and its relationship to the impact of hydrological studies. Reply to discussions of "Editorial-Quantifying the impact of hydrological studies", Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (2), 495–499, 2008.

[doc_id=856]

[English]

PDF Full text (150 KB)

See also: http://dx.doi.org/10.1623/hysj.53.2.495

Our works referenced by this work:

1. Z. W. Kundzewicz, and D. Koutsoyiannis, Editorial - The peer-review system: prospects and challenges, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 50 (4), 577–590, 2005.
2. Z. W. Kundzewicz, and D. Koutsoyiannis, Pathologies, improvements and optimism, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (2), 357–363, 2006.
3. D. Koutsoyiannis, and Z. W. Kundzewicz, Editorial - Quantifying the impact of hydrological studies, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52 (1), 3–17, 2007.

Works that cite this document: View on Google Scholar or ResearchGate

Other works that reference this work (this list might be obsolete):

1. Hughes, D. A., K. V. Heal and C. Leduc, Improving the visibility of hydrological sciences from developing countries, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 10.1080/02626667.2014.938653, 2014.

Tagged under: Peer review system