Editorial - The peer-review system: prospects and challenges

Z. W. Kundzewicz, and D. Koutsoyiannis, Editorial - The peer-review system: prospects and challenges, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 50 (4), 577–590, 2005.

[doc_id=661]

[English]

PDF Full text (209 KB)

See also: http://dx.doi.org/10.1623/hysj.2005.50.4.577

Our works referenced by this work:

1. C. Gardner, D. Koutsoyiannis, Z. W. Kundzewicz, and F. Watkins, IAHS and Electronic Publishing of HSJ, 5 pages, International Association of Hydrological Sciences, London, 2003.

Our works that reference this work:

1. Z. W. Kundzewicz, and D. Koutsoyiannis, Pathologies, improvements and optimism, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (2), 357–363, 2006.
2. D. Koutsoyiannis, Editorial - Grateful and apprehensive, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (6), 987–988, 2006.
3. D. Koutsoyiannis, and Z. W. Kundzewicz, Editorial - Quantifying the impact of hydrological studies, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 52 (1), 3–17, 2007.
4. D. Koutsoyiannis, and Z. W. Kundzewicz, The choice of language and its relationship to the impact of hydrological studies. Reply to discussions of "Editorial-Quantifying the impact of hydrological studies", Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53 (2), 495–499, 2008.
5. D. Koutsoyiannis, and Z. W. Kundzewicz, Editorial—Recycling paper vs recycling papers, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 54 (1), 3–4, 2009.

Works that cite this document: View on Google Scholar or ResearchGate

Other works that reference this work (this list might be obsolete):

1. Makropoulos, C., D. Butler and C. Maksimovic, Discussion of "Editorial - The peer-review system: prospects and challenges", Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (2), 350-351, 2006.
2. Pannell, D.J., Discussion of "Editorial - The peer-review system: prospects and challenges", Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (2), 352-353, 2006.
3. Schumann, A.H., Discussion of "Editorial - The peer-review system: prospects and challenges", Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (2), 354-354, 2006.
4. Wong, T.S.W., Discussion of "Editorial - The peer-review system: prospects and challenges", Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51 (2), 355-356, 2006.
5. Kundzewicz, Z.W., Editorial - Welcome, Demetris, as HSJ Deputy Editor, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 51(6), 987, 2006.
6. Sivakumar, B., Undermining the science or undermining Nature?, Hydrological Processes, 22(6), 893-897, 2008.
7. Cudennec, C., and P. Hubert, The multi-objective role of HSJ in processing and disseminating hydrological knowledge - Discussion of "Editorial - Quantifying the impact of hydrological studies", Hydrological Sciences Journal, 53(2), 485-487, 2008.
8. Sivakumar, B., Peer-review system and anonymity of reviewers: A three-pronged proposal, Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 13(7), 529-530, 2008.
9. Khan, M. S., Exploring citations for conflict of interest detection in peer review system, International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, 4, 283-299, 2012.
10. Ma, Z., Y. Pan, Z. Yu, J. Wang, J. Jia and Y. Wu, A quantitative study on the effectiveness of peer review for academic journals, Scientometrics, 95 (1), 1-13, 2013.
11. Hughes, D. A., K. V. Heal and C. Leduc, Improving the visibility of hydrological sciences from developing countries, Hydrological Sciences Journal, 10.1080/02626667.2014.938653, 2014.

Tagged under: Peer review system